Cloud voice models for Mac app
Š
Šimon Demočko
Hi, I'm moving from Murmurtype to Superwhisper, but as I was doing some testing, I found out on my Mac M1 Pro, that Murmurtype returns result significantly faster. Enough for me to keep using MMT and run Superwhisper in parallel for situations where MMT fails to transcribe (cause MMT fails very ungracefully). If I could have an option for using a mode that sends data for transcription to cloud like Murmur Type does, then I would definitely move to Super Whisper only. And I would aim for local transcription when recording more private matters or when the cloud would fail and I would use the local one as a plan B solution.
Christopher Davis
I have been using Superwhisper for a long time and also started using MMT. MMT has fewer features, is less robust, and doesn't offer customizability. However, it is fast, easy to use, and rarely fails to execute. Its transcriptions are often good enough. I still prefer Superwhisper and really admire the hustle and creativity of the developer. I agree with another user that Superwhisper needs to have a good-enough option that runs without operational errors. When I use both side by side, I find myself using MMT more often, even though I don't want to, but it just always executes. (I obtained MMT through a subscription and paid the full license price for Superwhisper.) I don't have the solution, or I guess I would be a developer.